lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3
> I'm not complaining about anything.  Who has?
>
> As the filesystem is for occasional, non-performance-sensitive use
> by a very small number of people, doing it via FUSE sounds like an
> all-round more practical approach. This has nothing to do with quality of
> implementation at all.

It's a stupid idea. Moving a simple block based filesystem means it's
more complicated, less efficient because of the additional context
switches and harder to use because you need additional userspace
packages and need to setup fuse.

We made writing block based filesystems trivial in the kernel to grow
more support for filesystems like this one.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-13 10:31    [W:0.155 / U:0.344 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site