[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
    On Sunday 13 April 2008 23:13:01 Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > > Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > > > .. but that said, I think your patch is certainly better than what we
    > > > have now (or what Ingo was complaining about for the next merge
    > > > window). I certainly could live with it. I would just suggest against
    > > > ever then removing that "generic E1000" choice.
    > >
    > > You mean never ever remove PCI-E support from e1000?
    > No. I mean never ever remove the *configure* level thinking that "e1000 is
    > e1000".
    > There is no sense in *ever* showing it as two drivers to users, because
    > users do not see them as separate chipsets. They look identical, down to
    > the part names.
    > If it's a single family, and users can't even easily tell whether they
    > have version 1 or version 2 (PCI vs PCI-E), you shouldn't even ask them.
    > You should literally ask them: "do you want e1000 support".

    It's something like RTL8139. There are two versions of the chips. They even
    have the same PCI IDs. But there are two different drivers - 8139cp and
    8139too. It's really bad for users

    > That's it.
    > Once you have asked them that, you can then decide "ok, if you *really*
    > know what version of the chip you have, you can decide to only get limited
    > driver support".
    > But that's a secondary thing from a user perspective.
    > See the patch I already sent out.
    > Linus
    > --
    > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    > the body of a message to
    > More majordomo info at
    > Please read the FAQ at

    Ondrej Zary

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-04-13 23:37    [W:0.024 / U:6.744 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site