Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:57:43 +0900 | | From | Toshiharu Harada <> | | Subject | Re: [TOMOYO #7 30/30] Hooks for SAKURA and TOMOYO. | |
On 4/9/2008 9:49 PM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
>> We cordially request LSM changes to pass vfsmount parameters.> > Don't cordially request it - submit patches to make it happen. Or work
> with others who have been submitting such patches.
You are (always) right. :)
> There are two options:> 1) Submit patches to pass down the vfsmounts to the vfs helpers so that
> they can be passed to the existing security_inode hooks. -or-
> 2) Submit patches to add new security hooks to the callers where the
> vfsmount is already available (some have suggested moving the existing
> security_inode hooks to the callers, but that would cause problems for
> SELinux as I've posted elsewhere, so adding new hooks is preferable, and
> then SELinux can just default to the dummy functions for those new
> hooks).
Thank you for your suggestions. I drew a diagram. Is this correct?
Regards,
Toshiharu Harada
NTT DATA CORPORATION
[image] |  |