lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSun, 9 Mar 2008 12:05:11 +0100
FromIngo Molnar <>
SubjectRe: [RFC, PATCH] signals: print_fatal_signal: fix the signr "calculation"
* Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> wrote:

> I'm not sure print-fatal-signals was really ever intended for 
> non-coredump signals.  It doesn't seem like it would be all that 
> useful.  It's probably even undesireable for every normal C-c killing 
> something to cause a printk.

correct. We used to have them for SIGKILL but even that was confusing to 
users - so the intent very much is to only have them for truly 
unexpected, non-user generated and 'fatal', coredump-generating signals.

	Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-09 12:09    [from the cache]
©2003-2008