lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC, PATCH] signals: print_fatal_signal: fix the signr "calculation"

* Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> wrote:

> I'm not sure print-fatal-signals was really ever intended for
> non-coredump signals. It doesn't seem like it would be all that
> useful. It's probably even undesireable for every normal C-c killing
> something to cause a printk.

correct. We used to have them for SIGKILL but even that was confusing to
users - so the intent very much is to only have them for truly
unexpected, non-user generated and 'fatal', coredump-generating signals.

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-09 12:09    [W:0.079 / U:0.424 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site