Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:05:11 +0100 | | From | Ingo Molnar <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC, PATCH] signals: print_fatal_signal: fix the signr "calculation" | |
* Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure print-fatal-signals was really ever intended for
> non-coredump signals. It doesn't seem like it would be all that
> useful. It's probably even undesireable for every normal C-c killing
> something to cause a printk.
correct. We used to have them for SIGKILL but even that was confusing to
users - so the intent very much is to only have them for truly
unexpected, non-user generated and 'fatal', coredump-generating signals.
Ingo
|  |