Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:05:11 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [RFC, PATCH] signals: print_fatal_signal: fix the signr "calculation" |
| |
* Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure print-fatal-signals was really ever intended for > non-coredump signals. It doesn't seem like it would be all that > useful. It's probably even undesireable for every normal C-c killing > something to cause a printk.
correct. We used to have them for SIGKILL but even that was confusing to users - so the intent very much is to only have them for truly unexpected, non-user generated and 'fatal', coredump-generating signals.
Ingo
| |