lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: 2.6.25-rc3-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
    From
    Date
    On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 09:19 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
    > Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
    > > On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 16:57 +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
    > >>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9978
    > >>> Subject : 2.6.25-rc1: volanoMark 45% regression
    > >>> Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
    > >>> Date : 2008-02-13 10:30
    > >>> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/13/128
    > >>> Handled-By : Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
    > >>> Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
    > >>
    > >> Peter's revert of the load balance patches should fix this one. Yanmin,
    > >> could you please confirm if the patch at
    > >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/25/202 helps?
    > > I tested it against 2.6.25-rc3 on my 16-core tigerton machine. It really improves
    > > volano result although it doesn't recover all the result.
    > > Comparing with 2.6.24, without the patch, volanoMark has about 50% regression
    > > with 2.6.25-rc3. With the patch, volanoMark has about 15% regression.
    > >
    >
    > Have you had a chance to git-bisect the culprit after the revert?
    How to bisect it if the reverted patch is submitted after the culprit patch?

    -yanmin




    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-03-05 06:21    [W:0.021 / U:31.644 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site