Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 4 Mar 2008 23:30:27 +0000 | From | Matthew Garrett <> | Subject | Re: Regression in 2.6.25-rc3: s2ram segfaults before suspending |
| |
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 03:11:17PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > >> > >>PAE activates NX on 32-bit. So we probably had an NX regression that > >>got fixed by the side-effects of one of the unifications. Does it > >>start working if you disable NX via the noexec=off boot option? > > > >What's the state of play here? Is upshot that this change fixed a bug > >which broke s2ram, or caused a bug which broke s2ram? > > > > As far as I can tell, this change fixed a bug, and the fact that the bug > was fixed triggered a s2ram bug.
Strictly a libx86 bug, so I'll try to get an updated version uploaded in the near future. This won't hit x86_64 users, since the code is run through x86emu rather than executed directly.
-- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
| |