Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 4 Mar 2008 07:53:05 +0100 | | From | Ingo Molnar <> | | Subject | Re: bisected boot regression post 2.6.25-rc3.. please revert |
* Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> I'm staring at the disassembly and it's quite different but
>> follow_page() is rather large; trying to make a smaller testcase now
>
> sadly a more isolated testcase doesn't show the same behavior yet; so
> it's some fun interaction ;(
>
> more staring at the assembly for me
could you post the "bad" and the "good" disassembled functions, and the
specific gcc version string?
Ingo
|  |