Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.25-rc7-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24 | Date | Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:31:07 +0200 |
| |
On Monday, 31 of March 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 03:24:10PM -0400, Mark Lord wrote: > > Adrian Bunk wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 01:48:15PM -0400, Mark Lord wrote: > >>> Rafael, > >>> > >>> Add this one to the list? > >> > >> > >> That's not a regression from 2.6.24 > > .. > > > > 2.6.24 does not flood my syslog with those messages. > > 2.6.25-rc* does. Looks like a regression. > > > > The original bug was a hidden regression in 2.6.23, > > which nobody bothered to identify until now. > > Let's try to get this patch into Linus' tree without arguing > whether it might be called a post 2.6.24 regression or not. ;) > > > Just because some code "gets away with" a regression > > for a kernel or two, doesn't mean that regression shouldn't be fixed. > > No disagreement on this one. > > We already have over 200 known (and many more once reported) regressions > in the kernel, and all of them should be fixed...
The patch have already been merged, BTW.
Thanks, Rafael
| |