![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread
|
Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Thursday 2008-03-27 15:55, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: >> >> here is a new flash file system developed by Nokia engineers with >> help of the University of Szeged. The new file-system is called >> UBIFS, which stands for UBI file system. UBI is the wear-leveling/ >> bad-block handling/volume management layer which is already in >> mainline (see drivers/mtd/ubi). >> [...] > > And how does it compare to logfs? We don't know a lot about logfs, so you will really have to make your own comparison. However our general impressions are as follows: 1. In our testing logfs file operations seem to be much slower, see http://osl.sed.hu/wiki/ubifs/index.php/IOzone 2. logfs code base is much smaller i.e. UBIFS has 3-4 times as many lines of code. 3. logfs does not seem to have bad-block handling. 4. logfs does not seem to have wear-leveling. 5. We are not certain how scalable logfs is. We could be wrong about those things - don't flame us if we are. Ask us about UBIFS, not logfs. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2008-03-31 12:55 [W:0.166 / U:0.100 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||