lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    DateMon, 3 Mar 2008 06:20:07 +0000
    FromAl Viro <>
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] Add C99-style constructor macros for specific-sized integers
    On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 08:43:22PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
    > >>+#define S64_C(x) x ## LL
    > >>+#define U64_C(x) x ## ULL
    > >
    > >but can't we use the latter for all arches?
    > >
    > 
    > You really don't want to, as the whole point is that you want it to 
    > match what u64/s64 is defined as, in order to avoid spurious warnings.
    
    Excuse me, in which contexts?  Where does replacement of explicitly long
    constant with explicitly long long one generate warnings on a host that has
    range(long) equal to range(long long)?
    
    
    
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-03-03 07:23    [from the cache]
    ©2003-2008