![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 21:38:08 +0100
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
> On Mon 2008-03-03 20:43:00, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > The problem is that the kernel sleeps _less_ than asked for, not more. No hardware can be expected to work if its needed delays aren't respected.
> >
>
> Oops, that's bad. Can you perhaps create small testcase for
> scheduler/timer people to play with?
>
> Also... you may want to switch timesources. notsc fixed "wait for much
> too long" for me.
I'm afraid I could never reproduce the problem. So it's Simon that will have to do the tests for now..
--
-- Pierre Ossman
Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org
PulseAudio, core developer http://pulseaudio.org
rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-03-03 22:09 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||