![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon 2008-03-03 20:43:00, Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 11:40:31 +0100 > Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote: > > > > > Is mmc slow or does it just break down? Slow would be expected, but > > breaking down should be fixed in MMC, too... > > > > The problem is that the kernel sleeps _less_ than asked for, not more. No hardware can be expected to work if its needed delays aren't respected. > Oops, that's bad. Can you perhaps create small testcase for scheduler/timer people to play with? Also... you may want to switch timesources. notsc fixed "wait for much too long" for me. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-03-03 21:41 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||