Messages in this thread |  | | | From | Nick Piggin <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2.6.24] mm: BadRAM support for broken memory | | Date | Mon, 3 Mar 2008 16:32:47 +1100 | |
On Monday 03 March 2008 04:01, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Hi>> in general,> Agreed with we need bad memory treatness.>> > +#define PG_badram 20 /* BadRam page */>> some architecture use PG_reserved for treat bad memory.
> Why do you want introduce new page flag?> for show_mem() improvement?
I'd like to get rid of PG_reserved at some point. So I'd
rather not overload it with more meanings ;)
|  |