lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSun, 02 Mar 2008 22:12:37 -0800
From"H. Peter Anvin" <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] Add C99-style constructor macros for specific-sized integers
Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 08:43:22PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>>> +#define S64_C(x) x ## LL
>>>> +#define U64_C(x) x ## ULL
>>> but can't we use the latter for all arches?
>>>
>> You really don't want to, as the whole point is that you want it to 
>> match what u64/s64 is defined as, in order to avoid spurious warnings.
> 
> Excuse me, in which contexts?  Where does replacement of explicitly long
> constant with explicitly long long one generate warnings on a host that has
> range(long) equal to range(long long)?

printf, for example.

	-hpa


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-03 07:25    [from the cache]
©2003-2008