Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Sun, 02 Mar 2008 22:12:37 -0800 | | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add C99-style constructor macros for specific-sized integers | |
Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 08:43:22PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>>> +#define S64_C(x) x ## LL
>>>> +#define U64_C(x) x ## ULL
>>> but can't we use the latter for all arches?
>>>
>> You really don't want to, as the whole point is that you want it to
>> match what u64/s64 is defined as, in order to avoid spurious warnings.
>
> Excuse me, in which contexts? Where does replacement of explicitly long
> constant with explicitly long long one generate warnings on a host that has
> range(long) equal to range(long long)?
printf, for example.
-hpa
|  |