![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> > That I've seen before, analysed a bit and posted: > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.input/4281 > > Ahh.. And this is presumably triggered either by some new Xorg behavior in > fc9 or just the scheduler timing changes that caused other things too? I tend to think it's actually a regression, I've done exactly what I described there dozens of times before on older kernels and it doesn't seem to be a race condition, X always locks the input device and I never had trouble with that before. > Your suggested solution sounds ok, but I'm also wondering why those things > aren't properly refcounted? It does sound like a bug to free the thing > before all users are gone - regardless of anything else. Hmm? I have to admit to not understanding the depths of the input code, I just took a quick look when I posted that. Mind you, that was 5 weeks ago! > But the ungrab sounds like the best short-term fix. Do we have a patch for > testing? Please? It's pretty late in the 2.6.25 cycle for these kinds of > things.. I don't. I think Dmitry just said in the other mail that he did, but I haven't seen that yet. johannes [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |||||||||
| Last update: 2008-03-28 21:45 [W:0.123 / U:0.310 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||