lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.25-rc7-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
Date
On Friday, 28 of March 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9412
> > Subject : commit a878539ef994787c447a98c2e3ba0fe3dad984ec breaks boot on SB600 AHCI
> > Submitter : Srihari Vijayaraghavan <sriharivijayaraghavan@yahoo.com.au>
> > Date : 2008-03-12 17:15 (16 days old)
> > Handled-By : Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
> > Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@amd.com>
>
> Fixed by 4cde32fc4b32e96a99063af3183acdfd54c563f0, methinks.

Closed.

> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9962
> > Subject : mount: could not find filesystem
> > Submitter : Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Date : 2008-02-12 14:34 (45 days old)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/12/91
> > Handled-By : Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> > Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
>
> Needs more info. The original oops that opened it is fixed, but..
>
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9976
> > Subject : BUG: 2.6.25-rc1: iptables postrouting setup causes oops
> > Submitter : Ben Nizette <bn@niasdigital.com>
> > Date : 2008-02-12 12:46 (45 days old)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/12/148
> > Handled-By : Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com>
>
> This one seems gone (and was apparently AVR-only):
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/13/607:
> "What ever the problem is it isn't immediately apparent in latest git so
> I guess we'll just have to keep our eyes peeled."

Closed, too.

> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9978
> > Subject : 2.6.25-rc1: volanoMark regression
> > Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
> > Date : 2008-02-13 10:30 (44 days old)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/13/128
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/12/52
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/18/81
> > Handled-By : Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Hmm. It is a regression on one machine (2x quad-core stoakley), but not
> another (4x quad-core tigerton).
>
> Interestingly, the stoakley box numbers have apparently been all over the
> map.
>
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10318
> > Subject : WARNING: at arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c:43 kmap_atomic_prot+0x87/0x184()
> > Submitter : Pawel Staszewski <pstaszewski@artcom.pl>
> > Date : 2008-03-25 02:50 (3 days old)
>
> Andrew and seems to have debugged this down to a kzalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) or
> similar.
>
> I wonder if the bug is in that commit
> 3811dbf67162bd08412f1b0e02e554f353e93bdb ("SLUB: remove useless masking
> of GFP_ZERO"), because I don't think that masking was at all useless and I
> think my original 7fd272550bd43cc1d7289ef0ab2fa50de137e767 was correct.
>
> That apparently bogus commit says "GFP_ZERO is already masked out in
> new_slab()", but gfpflags is not just used for new_slab(), but for
> kmalloc_large() too. Which does *not* clear GFP_ZERO.
>
> Pawel, does reverting 3811dbf67162bd08412f1b0e02e554f353e93bdb fix it for
> you?
>
> Also, Rafael - do these reminder emails also go to the people who are
> mentioned in the regressions (especially people who are set up as being
> "hanled-by" or having patches for the problem)?

No, they don't. I need to do some scriptwork to make that happen.

Thanks,
Rafael


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-28 17:13    [W:0.111 / U:9.408 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site