Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: 2.6.25-rc7-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24 | | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | | Date | Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:44:20 +0100 |
| |
On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 13:13 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:00:25PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 11:58 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9969 > > > > > Subject : 2.6.24-git15 Keyboard Issue? > > > > > Submitter : Chris Holvenstot <cholvenstot@comcast.net> > > > > > Date : 2008-02-06 14:02 (51 days old) > > > > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/6/100 > > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/13/82 > > > > > Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > > > > > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/15/343 > > > > > > > > asked the bug reporter for an update. > > > > > > Now that lkml.org is working again, I checked the patch which is > > > referenced above and I have a hard time to connect it even remotely to > > > that bug. > > > > > > As far as I can tell the discussion on lkml identified GROUP_SCHED=y > > > as the culprit, but I have no idea whether there was any resolution > > > other than disabling GROUP_SCHED. > > > > > > Peter ?? > > > > Correct, I am working on the issue but that's not going to be .25 stuff. > > How are we going to get 2.6.25 working no worse than 2.6.24? > > Letting GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN would sound logical, but that would > also kill FAIR_GROUP_SCHED.
Are we actually worse off than .24?
I thought group scheduling has been performing less than expected ever since it got merged.
|  |