lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] init()/fini() clean up in the crypto
Date
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> This patch cleanups the crypto code, replaces the init() and fini()  with the
> <algorithm name>_init/_fini

This part ist OK.

> or init/fini_<algorithm name> (if the
> <algorithm name>_init/_fini exist)

Having init_foo and foo_init won't be a good thing, will it? I'd start
confusing them.

What about foo_modinit instead?

¢¢

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-27 15:49    [W:0.050 / U:0.220 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site