![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi, 2008/3/27, Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@atmel.com>: > On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:08:37 +0300 > > Dmitry <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I like this idea! This would also allow to cleanup the references code, etc. > > > Great! > > > > Also after I saw such refactored struct clk, I thought that it looks > > nearly like kobject. Maybe we should switch to the kobject-based > > structs? What do you think? > > > I think that would be overkill. We should try to keep this stuff as > lightweight as possible, and I'm not sure if we can give the kobject > "parent" field the meaning we want it to have...or use the kref thing > to do something unrelated to object lifecycle management (i.e. we don't > want to destroy the object when the refcount goes to zero, we just want > to stop the clock.) ACK. Then I'll repost the updated patchset later. -- With best wishes Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2008-03-27 13:37 [W:0.356 / U:0.930 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||