![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:20:06 +0530 > Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > >> >> Add as_usage_in_bytes and as_limit_in_bytes interfaces. These provide >> control over the total address space that the processes combined together >> in the cgroup can grow upto. This functionality is analogous to >> the RLIMIT_AS function of the getrlimit(2) and setrlimit(2) calls. >> A as_res resource counter is added to the mem_cgroup structure. The >> as_res counter handles all the accounting associated with the virtual >> address space accounting and control of cgroups. >> >> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > I wonder that it's better to create "rlimit cgroup" rather than enhancing > memory controller. (But I have no strong opinion.) > How do you think ? I believe that all memory management is better to have in one controller... > Thanks, > -Kame > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-03-27 11:21 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||