![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 22:07 +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > PCI bridges at zero is perfectly valid indeed and I'm sure we have that > > around at least for IO space. In fact, I'm surprised you don't have that > > on x86. Typically, things like an HT segment with a P2P bridge and > > behind that bridge an ISA bridge could well have the P2P bridge with a > > resource forwarding 0...0x1000 IO downstream for example even on x86 > > no ? (I'm not -that- familiar with the crazyness of legacy ISA on x86 > > but I've definitely seen such setup on other archs). > On a PC system 0x00-0xFF are motherboard resources (sometimes chipset, > some even swallowed by the CPU in certain cases) so 0 as disabled is sort > of safe but as shown by the pci_enable_device_bars replacement code - not > a good idea neccessarily. > > A lot of driver code does assume 0 == unavailable/off/disabled including > large chunks of serial, ata, ide and probably other subsystems. True, and we do try to avoid allocating resources at 0 most of the time, but it happens, and in the case of bridges, it can make somewhat sense (more in fact than for devices I'd say). Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2008-03-26 22:33 [W:0.655 / U:0.060 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||