![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:15:49AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote: > > There is still the additional seek. > > You've been proposing and implementing a solution which needs an > additional seek. Don't use double standards. You're wrong. I am implementing a solution that allows two methods -- one (SHDR) that needs an seek (but an continuous one so it's likely served from the track buffer) but has some advantages and another one (PHDR) that does not require a seek. You two are arguing a method that always requires the seek and has a couple of other drawbacks as earlier discussed too. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2008-03-26 19:53 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||