[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 06/10] x86: reduce memory and stack usage in intel_cacheinfo
    Mike Travis wrote:
    > Hmm, I hadn't thought of that. There is commonly a format spec called
    > %b for diags, etc. to print bit strings. Maybe something like:
    > "... %*b ...", nr_cpu_ids, ptr_to_bitmap
    > where the length arg is rounded up to 32 or 64 bits...?

    I think that would need to be %.*b, but I always need to try it both
    ways anyway...

    But yes, that seems like the right way to go.

    >> Eh? What's the difference between snprintf and scnprintf?
    > Good question... I'll have to ask the cpumask person. ;-)

    It's in generic lib/vsprintf.c. The two functions are pretty much
    identical... Oh, I see; snprintf returns the total output size,
    regardless of whether it fits into the provided buffer, but scnprintf
    returns the actual output size, clipped by the buffer length.


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-03-26 18:01    [W:0.021 / U:15.608 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site