[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6
Emmanuel Florac wrote:
> Le Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:42:28 -0400 vous écriviez:
>> And this is what I was saying earlier, there is a trend to blame the
>> benchmark when in fact the same benchmark runs well on 2.4.
> As I mentioned, it looks like 2.4 actually buffers write data on RAID-1
> which is inherently bad (after all if I do RAID-1 it's for the sake of
> data integrity, and write caching just counters that).
> However, how bad dd may be, it reflects broadly my problem : on small
> systems using software RAID, IO is overall way better with 2.4 than
> 2.6, especially NFS thruput.
> Though I can substantially enhance 2.6 performance through tweaking
> (playing with read ahead, disk queue length etc), it still lags behind
> 2.4 with defaults settings by a clear margin (10% or more).
> This isn't true - fortunately - of larger systems with 12, 24, 48 disks
> drives, hardware RAID, Fibre Channel and al.

This sounds more like a VM issue than a RAID issue. I suspect the
interesting difference between your small systems and your large systems
is the amount of RAM, not the storage. On small systems, the penalty
for sizing caches incorrectly is much greater, so small systems tend to
suffer more if the default tunings are a little off.

If you do some VM tuning (particularly in /proc/sys/vm) and find that it
makes a large difference, please do report it. Most of the exciting VM
work is targeted to the high end, not the low end, so it's quite
possible that the heuristics which choose default VM parameters at boot
time are no longer as good for small systems as they once were.

-- Chris
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-26 17:59    [W:0.106 / U:2.952 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site