Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:08:20 -0400 | | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC 5/8] x86_64: Add UV specific header for MMR definitions |
| |
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:04:22AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > bitfields are only problematic on portable code, which this isn't.
it's still crappy to read and a bad example for others. And last time I heard about UV it also included an ia64 version, but that's been loooong ago.
|  |