lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 25 Mar 2008 16:20:42 -0700
FromDavid Brownell <>
SubjectRe: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c
I _almost_ hate bringing this lovely flamage back onto $SUBJECT ... but
what's the resolution for the leds-gpio.c issue?  I've not seen a merge
notice for the patch I submitted a week ago now:

	http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120597839009399&w=2

Just a "leaning..." comment:

	http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120606104619198&w=2

Seems to me that by now there ought to be resolution on at least
one of the issues brought up on this thread.  :)

- Dave



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-25 23:23    [W:1.106 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans