![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Mark Lord wrote: >> >> Yeah, that would be just as good, really. Maybe even better. >> >> Mark Lord wrote (later on): >>> Instead, software has to search everything inside /sys/block/ >>> looking for a "dev" file whose contents match, >>> rather than just trying to access something like this: >>> >>> /sys/block/8:1/start >>> or >>> /sys/block/majors/8/minors/1/start >>> >>> Or any one of a number of similar ways to arrange it. >> .. > > It shouldn't be under /sys/block... there are enough many things that > scan /sys/block and assume any directory underneath it has the current > format. .. So long as we only add things, and not remove them, then any software that scans /sys/block/ shouldn't care, really. But yes, it could go elsewhere, too. Perhaps a /sys/dev/ directory, populated with symbolic links (or hard links?) back to the /sys/block/ entries, something like this: /sys/dev/block/8:0 -> ../../../block/sda /sys/dev/block/8:1 -> ../../../block/sda/sda1 /sys/dev/block/8:2 -> ../../../block/sda/sda2 ... That's just a suggestion, really. And what about character devices? Perhaps Greg will chime in. | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-03-25 18:39 [W:3.810 / U:0.000 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||