![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 12:57:29AM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: > Furthermore, I honestly don't see how your patch meets the (rather > strict) requirements of stable series either. So it would be nice if > one of the stable maintainers stepped up to say that these kind of > patches are okay to set a precedent for others as well. These kind of patches are perfectly fine. We trust the maintainers of drivers and subsystems to tell the -stable maintainers what they want added to the tree, and if that includes a version number update to make their lives easier, who are we to say no to that. Becides, it's not the first time patches like this have been accepted. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2008-03-23 05:11 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||