![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
I wrote: >>> and eth1394 to deal with temporary lack of of tlabels. Alas I just >>> recently received a report that eth1394's workaround is unsuccessful >>> on non-preemptible uniprocessor kernels. > (I haven't started working on a fix, or opened a bugzilla > ticket for it yet. The reporter currently switched his kernel to > PREEMPT which is not affected.) now logged as http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10306 > The failure in the workaround is *not* about the in_atomic() being the > wrong question asked in hpsb_get_tlabel() --- no, ieee1394's in_atomic() > abuse works just fine even on UP PREEMPT_NONE. Instead, the failure is > about kthreads not being scheduled in the way that I thought they would. -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--- --== =-==- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-03-22 12:33 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||