lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86_64: early memtest to find bad ram
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 03:29:19PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> >
> > >> very nice patch! I always thought that this was the proper way to do
> > >> memtest - and we could in fact also do something like this after SMP
> > >> bringup, and hit the memory bus via multiple CPUs. [that will need a
> > >> different enumeration though than e820 maps]
> > >>
> > >> one structural observation: please make this unified functionality,
> > >> so that 32-bit kernels can make use of it too.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Indeed. Of course, it would also be nice if distros shipped
> > > bootloader-invoked prekernel test software, like memtest86+, by
> > > default.
> >
> > some do (Fedora for example), but it's still a bit quirky for users to
> > invoke and it would be nice to see those results in the kernel log as
> > well and flag possibly flaky systems that way. (add a taint bit, etc.,
> > etc.)
>
> It may even make sense to merge in the full memtest86. The code is small
> (both source and binary) and IIRC it shares a lot of init code with x86.
> The remaining problem would then be how to maintain its tests up do date.

memtester is another choice, and it is more easy to be merged.

YH


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-22 07:51    [W:0.058 / U:0.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site