[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] [keys] Always use key_get() to increment key refcount
    On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, David Howells wrote:

    > Arun Raghavan <> wrote:
    > > Patch to use key_get() wherever the keys code manually increments the
    > > key refcount.
    > >
    > > This should make debugging a little simpler for clients, since it
    > > becomes easier to track where a key's refcount changes.
    > The problem with this is that key_get() is not simply an atomic_inc(). You
    > end up introducing an extra conditional into each of these places where one is
    > not required. Now it's possible that the compiler's optimiser is sufficiently
    > clever to get rid of them all, but do you guarantee that?

    Is this really a significant performance penalty? If yes, wouldn't a
    likely() be sufficient to mitigate the penalty?

    The same arguments should also be applied to key_put(), I guess.


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-03-20 12:51    [W:0.022 / U:291.764 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site