Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 2 Mar 2008 09:15:41 -0800 | From | "Ray Lee" <> | Subject | Re: assertion (packets <= tp->packets_out) failed |
| |
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> wrote: > On Sat, 1 Mar 2008, Ray Lee wrote: > > > Wireless below is b43, wired interface (tg3) was disconnected. I run > > openvpn which uses a tun interface and regularly sends a heartbeat > > even when not in use. The trace appeared twice. > > > > Likely unrelated but reporting just for completeness: about fifteen > > minutes after this the system oopsed when I told my wireless base > > station to switch from mixed B/G to just B. I'll be taking that up > > separately with the bcm43xx list. > > > > Mar 1 11:06:37 phoenix kernel: [35251.208275] eth1: switched to short > > barker preamble (BSSID=00:16:01:d1:44:3e) > > Mar 1 11:06:37 phoenix kernel: [35251.320282] eth1: switched to long > > barker preamble (BSSID=00:16:01:d1:44:3e) > > Mar 1 11:08:28 phoenix kernel: [35274.396163] KERNEL: assertion > > (packets <= tp->packets_out) failed at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c (2139) > > Mar 1 11:08:29 phoenix kernel: [35274.406126] ------------[ cut here > > ]------------ > > Mar 1 11:08:29 phoenix kernel: [35274.406132] WARNING: at > > net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2506 tcp_ack+0xe3f/0x1b12() > > Do people ever look into archives before posting? I'm a bit tired of point > to the debug patch: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120418703023153&w=2
I'm sorry, I managed to miss it. I'll apply the patch and report back.
Thank you.
| |