lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSun, 2 Mar 2008 10:44:29 +0200 (EET)
From"Ilpo_Järvinen" <>
SubjectRe: assertion (packets <= tp->packets_out) failed
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008, Ray Lee wrote:

> Wireless below is b43, wired interface (tg3) was disconnected. I run
> openvpn which uses a tun interface and regularly sends a heartbeat
> even when not in use. The trace appeared twice.
> 
> Likely unrelated but reporting just for completeness: about fifteen
> minutes after this the system oopsed when I told my wireless base
> station to switch from mixed B/G to just B. I'll be taking that up
> separately with the bcm43xx list.
> 
> Mar  1 11:06:37 phoenix kernel: [35251.208275] eth1: switched to short
> barker preamble (BSSID=00:16:01:d1:44:3e)
> Mar  1 11:06:37 phoenix kernel: [35251.320282] eth1: switched to long
> barker preamble (BSSID=00:16:01:d1:44:3e)
> Mar  1 11:08:28 phoenix kernel: [35274.396163] KERNEL: assertion
> (packets <= tp->packets_out) failed at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c (2139)
> Mar  1 11:08:29 phoenix kernel: [35274.406126] ------------[ cut here
> ]------------
> Mar  1 11:08:29 phoenix kernel: [35274.406132] WARNING: at
> net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2506 tcp_ack+0xe3f/0x1b12()

Do people ever look into archives before posting? I'm a bit tired of point 
to the debug patch:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120418703023153&w=2

-- 
 i.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-02 09:47    [from the cache]
©2003-2008