Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 2 Mar 2008 10:44:29 +0200 (EET) | From | "Ilpo Järvinen" <> | Subject | Re: assertion (packets <= tp->packets_out) failed |
| |
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008, Ray Lee wrote:
> Wireless below is b43, wired interface (tg3) was disconnected. I run > openvpn which uses a tun interface and regularly sends a heartbeat > even when not in use. The trace appeared twice. > > Likely unrelated but reporting just for completeness: about fifteen > minutes after this the system oopsed when I told my wireless base > station to switch from mixed B/G to just B. I'll be taking that up > separately with the bcm43xx list. > > Mar 1 11:06:37 phoenix kernel: [35251.208275] eth1: switched to short > barker preamble (BSSID=00:16:01:d1:44:3e) > Mar 1 11:06:37 phoenix kernel: [35251.320282] eth1: switched to long > barker preamble (BSSID=00:16:01:d1:44:3e) > Mar 1 11:08:28 phoenix kernel: [35274.396163] KERNEL: assertion > (packets <= tp->packets_out) failed at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c (2139) > Mar 1 11:08:29 phoenix kernel: [35274.406126] ------------[ cut here > ]------------ > Mar 1 11:08:29 phoenix kernel: [35274.406132] WARNING: at > net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2506 tcp_ack+0xe3f/0x1b12()
Do people ever look into archives before posting? I'm a bit tired of point to the debug patch:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120418703023153&w=2
-- i.
| |