Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:01:36 +0000 | From | Mel Gorman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] [5/18] Expand the hugetlbfs sysctls to handle arrays for all hstates |
| |
On (18/03/08 17:49), Andi Kleen didst pronounce: > > Also, offhand it's not super-clear why max_huge_pages is not part of > > hstate as we only expect one hstate per pagesize anyway. > > They need to be an separate array for the sysctl parsing function. >
D'oh, of course. Pointing that out answers my other questions in relation to how writing single values to a proc entry affects multiple pools as well. I was still thinking of max_huge_pages as as a single value instead of an array.
Thanks
-- Mel Gorman Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
| |