Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: Linux 2.6.25-rc4 | | Date | Sun, 16 Mar 2008 15:29:00 +0100 | | From | Anders Eriksson <> | |
bzolnier@gmail.com said:
> This commit is also _after_ the previously "guilty" one (commit
> 852738f39258deafb3d89c187cb1a4050820d555)?
Yep.
> IIRC we've agreed that bisection between 2.6.24 and commit 8527* was needed?
I did that first, and it pointed to 8527* as the bad one. During this bisect
I took care to always start from a 2.6.24 .config, and do a make oldconfig from
that. A clean series of good emerged.. Unfortunately I don't have the configs
from the previous runs saved.
Given this, I concluded that the configs had to play a role in making a
version go bad, so I decided to do another one between 8527* and 2.6.25-rc1
always based on the 8527* config (which _worked_ when tested with the 2.6.24
config dragged forward. So the upped end of the first bisect was badly chosen)
The attahed was the result of that latter run...
> Thanks,
|  |