![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
bzolnier@gmail.com said: > This commit is also _after_ the previously "guilty" one (commit > 852738f39258deafb3d89c187cb1a4050820d555)? Yep. > IIRC we've agreed that bisection between 2.6.24 and commit 8527* was needed? I did that first, and it pointed to 8527* as the bad one. During this bisect I took care to always start from a 2.6.24 .config, and do a make oldconfig from that. A clean series of good emerged.. Unfortunately I don't have the configs from the previous runs saved. Given this, I concluded that the configs had to play a role in making a version go bad, so I decided to do another one between 8527* and 2.6.25-rc1 always based on the 8527* config (which _worked_ when tested with the 2.6.24 config dragged forward. So the upped end of the first bisect was badly chosen) The attahed was the result of that latter run... > Thanks, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2008-03-16 15:33 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||