![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed 2008-03-12 21:14:56, David Newall wrote: > Jiri Kosina wrote: > > Very probably this is due to broken way how X themselves implement > > auto-repeat, instead of using kernel-provided auto-repeat functionality. > > It should be said that X implements auto-repeat out of necessity. While > the kernel can report key down and up events, its further interpretation > of those events is not appropriate. Many combinations of events are > possible, such as keyboard plus mouse, and this precludes the kernel > from providing a full interpretation. It would be wrong for it to even > try. X is the proper place to implement auto-repeat for X. No. hw is proper place to implement autorepeat, and along with some buffering, it has chance to work. Kernel is not real-time, and X are definitely not real-time, while autorepeat is real-time operation. It actually mostly works in ps/2 case. Buffer in hardware means that pretty big interrupt delays can be tolerated without problems. -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-03-13 18:19 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||