Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:04:58 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [2.6.25-rc5-mm1] BUG: spinlock bad magic early during boot |
| |
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:54:43 +0100 Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc> wrote:
> Am 11.03.2008 09:14 schrieb Andrew Morton: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc5/2.6.25-rc5-mm1/ > > This still complains during startup: > > <6>[ 0.063442] Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK. > <0>[ 0.068233] BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, swapper/0 > <0>[ 0.068996] lock: c2c19380, .magic: 00000000, .owner: swapper/0, .owner_cpu: 0 > <4>[ 0.069227] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.25-rc5-mm1-testing #1 > <4>[ 0.069369] [spin_bug+124/135] spin_bug+0x7c/0x87 > <4>[ 0.069563] [_raw_spin_unlock+25/113] _raw_spin_unlock+0x19/0x71 > <4>[ 0.069752] [_spin_unlock+29/60] _spin_unlock+0x1d/0x3c > <4>[ 0.069941] [mnt_want_write+98/136] mnt_want_write+0x62/0x88 > <4>[ 0.070131] [sys_mkdirat+134/214] sys_mkdirat+0x86/0xd6 > <4>[ 0.070322] [clean_path+22/74] ? clean_path+0x16/0x4a > <4>[ 0.070558] [kfree+216/236] ? kfree+0xd8/0xec > <4>[ 0.070793] [sys_mkdir+16/18] sys_mkdir+0x10/0x12 > <4>[ 0.070995] [do_name+274/435] do_name+0x112/0x1b3 > <4>[ 0.071184] [write_buffer+29/44] write_buffer+0x1d/0x2c > <4>[ 0.071371] [flush_window+100/179] flush_window+0x64/0xb3 > <4>[ 0.071558] [unpack_to_rootfs+1580/2233] unpack_to_rootfs+0x62c/0x8b9 > <4>[ 0.071747] [populate_rootfs+32/265] populate_rootfs+0x20/0x109 > <4>[ 0.071995] [alternative_instructions+339/344] ? alternative_instructions+0x153/0x158 > <4>[ 0.072235] [start_kernel+835/853] start_kernel+0x343/0x355 > <4>[ 0.072422] [i386_start_kernel+8/10] i386_start_kernel+0x8/0xa > <4>[ 0.072610] ======================= > <6>[ 0.072808] Unpacking initramfs... done > > System comes up fine, though. Not sure whom to CC.
Dave, methinks.
> Machine's a dual-core Pentium D running a 32 bit kernel. > Let me know if you want me to provide more information or test anything.
I thought we already fixed this, actually. Maybe we just talked about it a bit?
| |