Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 11 Mar 2008 21:15:18 -0700 (PDT) | | From | Christoph Lameter <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] Implement slub fastpath with sequence number | |
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> I would really prefer if we defer all this fast path fiddling until we
> have the cpu_ops in place, this all just makes the code utterly
> unreadable.
Ahhh.. Are you are volunteering to take the cpu_ops/cpu_alloc patchset?
|  |