lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 9 Feb 2008 10:33:43 +0100
FromIngo Molnar <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] kmemcheck v3
* Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:

> > Yes, this is true. Then our task is to make sure that this memory is 
> > never allocated from tracked caches. We do have some changes in this 
> > area, for instance we never track task structs. Keep in mind that 
> > only slab objects are tracked currently, so things like stacks never 
> > catch page faults. I am not sure if this is exactly what you had in 
> > mind, but I don't know other kernel code very well enough to come up 
> > with perhaps more relevant examples :-)
> 
> Given that you don't seem to handle networking yet I wonder how many 
> cases you really tested so far.

you are wrong about no networking support: i have booted up a full 
distro config on real hardware with full networking, etc.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-09 10:37    [from the cache]
©2003-2008