![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Pekka Enberg wrote: > No. We need to not track the whole page to avoid recursive faults. So > for kmemcheck we absolutely do need cache_cache but we can, of course, > hide that under a alloc_cache() function that only uses the extra cache > when CONFIG_KMEMCHECK is enabled? Btw, one option is to have a new _page flag_ so that we no longer need to look inside struct kmem_cache in the page fault handler. Pekka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2008-02-08 06:37 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||