lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 08 Feb 2008 08:33:57 +0200
FromPekka Enberg <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] kmemcheck v3
Pekka Enberg wrote:
> No. We need to not track the whole page to avoid recursive faults. So 
> for kmemcheck we absolutely do need cache_cache but we can, of course, 
> hide that under a alloc_cache() function that only uses the extra cache 
> when CONFIG_KMEMCHECK is enabled?

Btw, one option is to have a new _page flag_ so that we no longer need 
to look inside struct kmem_cache in the page fault handler.

			Pekka


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-08 06:37    [from the cache]
©2003-2008