lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] USB: mark USB drivers as being GPL only
David Newall ha scritto:

> "Of course", because in many parts of the world, a device who's
> manufacturer fails to take reasonable steps to prevent it from being
> used outside regulatory limits is illegal. Providing source code not
> only is a failure to take those reasonable steps, but is quite the
> opposite. It may even be viewed as encouraging users to use it
> inappropriately.
If the device is well engineered, there's nothing the sw can do to make
it work outside regulatory limits.
Sometimes there's simply NOTHING the SW can do to *avoid* it. Think
about a CB radio. International standard is 5W (well, somewhere it's 3,
IIRC, but that's another story: nobody produces a special model with a
final amplifier for only 3W, everyone produces the 5W and turns down
power in some other way). But linear amplifiers are commonly sold. And
(at least in Italy) it's not illegal to buy one, even if it can boost
antenna power to 1000W. It's illegal just to USE it.
If a citizen of a country where only 3W are allowed opens his CB and
removes the limiter, it makes the use of THAT CB illegal, not the use of
that MODEL: untampered ones are still legal!

And it's a logical problem, too: why should the *driver* enforce a
*technical* limit? It's up to the device. If the driver tells my WiFi
device to use 10W, should it fail? I think so! IMO there's no judge that
can rule out that an open source driver is encouraging users to use a
device over its regulatory limits: there are easier ways (like lying
about the configured country, to get more channels or more power) than
hacking a driver. Else it should be ruled "reasonable" having to sell
different drivers in different countries (no user-selectable country to
choose, no lying possible... as long as the user doesn't download an
updated driver...).

The key is "reasonable". IMVHO enforcing a limit with a driver is not a
"reasonable step to prevent use outside regulatory limits". There are
more effective ways to enforce those limits that costs about the same.

BYtE,
Diego.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-07 09:35    [W:0.227 / U:0.628 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site