lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [patch 2/3] CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables.
    From
    Date
    On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 10:46 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > > I got x86-64 compiled by removing the #include <asm/pgalloc.h> from
    > > asm-generic/tlb.h. But who knows what will break if the include is
    > > missing .. I'll cross compile some of the other architectures next.
    > >
    >
    > urgh, well, thanks for trying. If there's significant risk factor (or
    > hassle) in fixing the macros then I'd suggest we not do it for now - it's a
    > separate project.

    I'm still at it. I does make sense to convert the damn macros to inline
    functions. The question now is the order of things, the macro cleanup
    first or the sub-page page tables first? I would prefer the sub-page
    page tables first since that code has been hanging around in -mm for a
    while and could go upstream after I regenerated the patch and test
    compiled it again. We do need it for KVM and we want to push our KVM
    patches for s390 soon.

    --
    blue skies,
    Martin.

    "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.




    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-02-06 10:09    [W:0.022 / U:1.220 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site