lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [Regression] 2.6.24-git9: RT sched mishandles artswrapper (bisected)
    Date
    On Wednesday, 6 of February 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    >
    > On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 22:50 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
    > > On Wednesday, 6 of February 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    >
    > > > Well, that whole queue.
    > >
    > > It doesn't compile for me.
    >
    > I did solve some compile issues since posting, Ingo should have the
    > compiling version in sched-devel soonish (don't know if he pushed it
    > already).

    Can you point me to the cleaned up version, please?

    > > > Your test program just failed to obtain realtime scheduling
    > >
    > > Well, it shouldn't. The expected result is to obtain realtime scheduling
    > > or we will break existing setups.
    >
    > Thats a case of wrong expectations in my book. You enabled group
    > scheduling and hence behaviour changes.

    So, I'd have to unset FAIR_GROUP_SCHED to obtain the previous behavior?

    > There is just nothing much one can do about it, if you don't assign bandwidth
    > to a group, it won't be able to run anything. Better to refuse to run, than to sit
    > idle, right?

    As a general rule, probably yes.

    > But I appreciate the situation, therefore I made the whole rt-group
    > scheduling a separate .config option (which defaults to n)

    Which is introduced by the new patches, isn't it?


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-02-06 23:23    [W:4.110 / U:0.064 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site