lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 5 Feb 2008 23:35:40 +0100
From"Oliver Pinter" <>
SubjectRe: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS
/usr/data/source/git/linux-2.6/drivers/block/ub.c: In function 'ub_end_rq':
/usr/data/source/git/linux-2.6/drivers/block/ub.c:819: error: implicit
declaration of function 'end_that_request_first'
/usr/data/source/git/linux-2.6/drivers/block/ub.c:820: error: implicit
declaration of function 'end_that_request_last'
make[7]: *** [drivers/block/ub.o] Error 1
make[6]: *** [drivers/block] Error 2
make[5]: *** [drivers] Error 2
make[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

On 2/5/08, Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@gmail.com> wrote:
> i reverted this commit 7d699bafe258ebd8f9b4ec182c554200b369a504 , and
> now compile ...
>
> On 2/5/08, Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:05:06 -0800, Andrew Morton
> <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Looks like you deadlocked in ub_request_fn().  I assume that you were
> > using
> > > ub.c in 2.6.23 and that it worked OK?  If so, we broke it, possibly via
> > > changes to the core block layer.
> > >
> > > I think ub.c is basically abandoned in favour of usb-storage.  If so,
> > > perhaps we should remove or disble ub.c?
> >
> > Actually I think it may be an argument for keeping ub, if ub exposes
> > a bug in the __blk_end_request. I'll look at the head of the thread
> > and see if Mr. Pinter has hit anything related to Mr. Ueda's work.
> >
> > -- Pete
> >
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Oliver
>


-- 
Thanks,
Oliver


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-05 22:39    [from the cache]
©2003-2008