lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
FromRusty Russell <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Whine about suspicious return values from module's ->init() hook
DateTue, 5 Feb 2008 17:08:37 +1100
On Tuesday 05 February 2008 14:53:18 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:43:31 +1100 Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> 
wrote:
> > On Tuesday 05 February 2008 02:42:15 Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > > One head-scratching session could be noticeably shorter with this
> > > patch...
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@sw.ru>
> >
> > If we want to prevent > 0 returns, let's just BUG_ON().
>
> That risks killing previously-working setups.  WARN_ON is sufficient.

I disagree.  WARN_ON is useful for developers, but they can handle BUG_ON, 
too.

If we were in freeze, I'd say WARN_ON.

Even better, audit them all, then BUG_ON.  Alexey?
Rusty.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-05 07:11    [from the cache]
©2003-2008