lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 4 Feb 2008 11:30:01 +0100
FromAndi Kleen <>
SubjectRe: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability issues
> +	q = &__get_cpu_var(call_single_queue);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags);
> +	list_replace_init(&q->list, &list);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);

I think you could do that lockless if you use a similar data structure
as netchannels (essentially a fixed size single buffer queue with atomic 
exchange of the first/last pointers) and not using a list. That would avoid 
at least one bounce for the lock and likely another one for the  list
manipulation.

Also the right way would be to not add a second mechanism for this,
but fix the standard smp_call_function_single() to support it.

-Andi


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-04 11:33    [from the cache]
©2003-2008