Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 4 Feb 2008 20:07:01 -0600 | From | "Chris Weiss" <> | Subject | Re: [Scst-devel] Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| |
On Feb 4, 2008 11:30 AM, Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net> wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > >> better. So for example, I personally suspect that ATA-over-ethernet is way > >> better than some crazy SCSI-over-TCP crap, but I'm biased for simple and > >> low-level, and against those crazy SCSI people to begin with. > > > > Current ATAoE isn't. It can't support NCQ. A variant that did NCQ and IP > > would probably trash iSCSI for latency if nothing else. > > And a variant that doesn't do ATA or IP: > http://www.fcoe.com/ >
however, and interestingly enough, the open-fcoe software target depends on scst (for now anyway)
| |