lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] per-process securebits
    On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 18:17:22 +0000
    Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:

    > On Fri 2008-02-01 20:07:01, James Morris wrote:
    > > On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > >
    > > > Really? I'd feel a lot more comfortable if yesterday's version 1 had led
    > > > to a stream of comments from suitably-knowledgeable kernel developers which
    > > > indicated that those developers had scrutinised this code from every
    > > > conceivable angle and had declared themselves 100% happy with it.
    > >
    > > FWIW, I've reviewed the patch in detail a couple of times, and don't see
    > > any issues with it that haven't already been raised by Serge.
    > >
    > > You can add my reviewed-by.
    > >
    > > I think it does need more eyes, and some time baking in -mm.
    >
    > I don't thing -mm baking helps here. People playing with -mm are not
    > the ones trying to hack your box.
    >

    That's for sure. Whitebox testing and really really careful review
    is our best shot with this stuff.


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-02-04 23:05    [W:0.019 / U:30.552 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site