[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] per-process securebits
    On Fri 2008-02-01 20:07:01, James Morris wrote:
    > On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > > Really? I'd feel a lot more comfortable if yesterday's version 1 had led
    > > to a stream of comments from suitably-knowledgeable kernel developers which
    > > indicated that those developers had scrutinised this code from every
    > > conceivable angle and had declared themselves 100% happy with it.
    > FWIW, I've reviewed the patch in detail a couple of times, and don't see
    > any issues with it that haven't already been raised by Serge.
    > You can add my reviewed-by.
    > I think it does need more eyes, and some time baking in -mm.

    I don't thing -mm baking helps here. People playing with -mm are not
    the ones trying to hack your box.

    (cesky, pictures)

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-02-04 19:21    [W:0.044 / U:3.092 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site