lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] per-process securebits
On Fri 2008-02-01 20:07:01, James Morris wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > Really? I'd feel a lot more comfortable if yesterday's version 1 had led
> > to a stream of comments from suitably-knowledgeable kernel developers which
> > indicated that those developers had scrutinised this code from every
> > conceivable angle and had declared themselves 100% happy with it.
>
> FWIW, I've reviewed the patch in detail a couple of times, and don't see
> any issues with it that haven't already been raised by Serge.
>
> You can add my reviewed-by.
>
> I think it does need more eyes, and some time baking in -mm.

I don't thing -mm baking helps here. People playing with -mm are not
the ones trying to hack your box.

--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-04 19:21    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site