lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 20000+ wake-ups/second in 2.6.24. Bug?
On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 12:29:03 -0500
Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca> wrote:

> re: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9489
>
> This just happened here again. Or at least I finally noticed that
> the fan on my notebook seemed to be running hard for much longer
> than usual. :)
>
> Powertop showed 2.6.24-final running with 10000-36000 wakeups/sec,
> with *nothing* significant running: top showed 97+% idle on both
> cores.
>
> - Device: Errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal+
> Unsupported-
> + Device: Errors: Correctable+ Non-Fatal+ Fatal+
> Unsupported+ Device: RlxdOrd- ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-
> Device: MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 128 bytes
> Link: Supported Speed 2.5Gb/s, Width x1, ASPM L0s L1,
> Port 1 @@ -101,12 +101,12 @@
> Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
> Bus: primary=00, secondary=0c, subordinate=0c, sec-latency=0
> Memory behind bridge: efc00000-efcfffff
> - Secondary status: 66MHz- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast
> >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- <SERR- <PERR-
> + Secondary status: 66MHz- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast
> >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort+ <SERR- <PERR- BridgeCtl: Parity- SERR+
> >NoISA- VGA- MAbort- >Reset- FastB2B-

this shows you're having various types of really bad things going on, like PCI
master aborts and the like. Those would certainly be a factor in waking the cpu up;
they're basically hardware exceptions, and I can totally believe (would need to find out
from hw guys how this works in practice) that this sort of serious error would keep the
cpu out of deep C states until resolved.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-04 18:55    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site